Weblog

Tuesday, 06 January 2009

  • Reading the Bible

    My second child has announced that he wants to read the entire Bible.

    I will admit I am a little apprehensive, and have found myself annoyed when I've seen him following through.  I think the main reason I'm annoyed is because he is usually reading the bible when he's *supposed* to be cleaning his room.

    I think part of the reason is that I am not sure how to handle him getting super interested in going to church every week.  This last Sunday, my kids expressed an interest in attending the LDS church.  My DH (thanks Honey!) reminded them in time to get ready for church.  Of course, HE was too busy to actually go to church, and didn't think we needed to stay on the premises.  So, I went to church for the first time since Mother's Day.

    It was nice to be able to drop all four kids off at their various classes and not worry about them til church was over.  I was a little worried about #3, as he is officially out of nursery, and attending primary.  I wondered if he'd take it as hard as #2, who took a good 3 years to get over the fact that church no longer included free play with toys.  However, I am told that he did extremely well and was really well behaved and a real "sweetheart".  Anyway, all four kids came out of church very happy to have been there, and talking about how they want to go more often.

    I got an extremely warm welcome. People were just as friendly as I suspected they would be.  My doctrinal issues still exist.  It was sad to sit in church alone and not have my husband sitting next to me so we could make our snarky comments to each other.

    I felt a little bad for the relief society president.  She was beyond thrilled to see me there.  So in between sunday school and relief society, I was in the bathroom stall adjusting my panty hose (I'd forgotten how uncomfortable those things are!).  The stall door wouldn't latch properly.  The RS came running in to pee quickly before RS started.  Unfortunately, she was in such a hurry that she pounded my door to burst in and use that stall.  Luckily I was close enough to the door that it hit my shoulder and didn't bother me at all, other than startling me.  However, RS president was beyond horrified.  If I thought she had a sense of humor about it, I would have made some joke about that was why I was inactive, or that because of that I wasn't coming back.  I think she would've cried though, and still seemed hypersensitively concerned about the whole incident.  She came to sit by me during the lesson so she could apologize every time there was a lull in the lesson.  I really do like the woman, she is a genuinely nice and good person.  She simply takes life more seriously than I do.

Saturday, 03 January 2009

  • Thoughts on Christmas

    I went through the Christmas season with fresh eyes this year.  I read the story of Jesus' birth and tried to look at it as though I'd never heard it before.  I think that I am rejecting Christianity altogether.  I absolutely believe Jesus was born, lived, and was murdered by crucifixion.  However, I don't think he was the literal son of God.  I don't think that he had to die to "save" anyone.  I will admit I've struggled with the idea of salvation through the death of another for a long time now, so I'm really not surprised I came to this conclusion.

    I have watched a lot of people, and think that people in general are kind and conscientious.  I think that if  hugely pregnant woman, or an eldery or injured person got on a crowded train or bus, SOMEONE will give them a seat.  As I people watch, I see small acts of kindness every day, and it gives me hope for humankind.

    I applied what I've come to believe about human nature to the story of the birth of Jesus, and something doesn't add up.  Sure, I can believe there were no rooms available at any inn.  But, I am 100% sure that if people knew there was a woman in labor with no place to stay, at least one person with a room would've happily given their room to her.  I also believe that people would hear about that sort of thing going on- inns were much smaller then, and had a common dining area.  So, for there to be absolutely no place inside for Mary and Joseph to stay and give birth, one can assume one of two things:

    Theory 1:  It didn't happen this way at all, and time blurred the real story into the story that exists today.  Maybe they got into town and she was so far into labor that the stable was the first building they saw, so they went in there to have at least some privacy.  This theory sits better with me because it doesn't imply active cruelty on the part of people or God.

    Theory 2:  God purposely turned people away from trying to help.  I don't think God actively prods people into doing every single good deed.  So, for this to happen, he had to go out of His way to make sure nobody heard of the situation Joseph and Mary were facing so that nobody offered them their room.  Going out of his way to make sure the mother of His child had to give birth in a stable?  Can anyone be so cold?  Some may argue it was foretold it would happen that way.  But if God is all-seeing, all-knowing, and having some control, he could've had it foretold in a different way.  Accepting the story as told seems to make our Heavenly Father into a seriously cold hearted dude.

Sunday, 12 October 2008

  • I'd like to bear my testimony

    I've been slowly sifting back over the last ten years or so of my life, and trying to figure out what was really going on in my head.  I generally enjoyed going to church.  I had doubts about certain things, but didn't really delve too deeply into those niggling doubts.  I see so many clues that I was never that devoted to the church.  I see the same clues in my husband.  Honestly though, that was something that appealed to me.  I remember when I was in high school and I was dating, the majority of my boyfriends with either inactive in the church (or struggling members) or they weren't LDS altogether.  I did occasionally go on a date with an extremely active LDS boy.  For some reason, I never felt quite comfortable with them.  I felt as though I were unequal spiritually, that they were on a higher plane than I was.  It wasn't a sexist thing.  It just seemed like they never had a mean or unkind thing enter their heads.  I knew many of them would listen to hymns and read the scriptures on sunday whenever they weren't at church.  General, Stake, and Regional conference meant an extra special time to learn more of God's word, not a week off, like it was in my mind.

    Although my husband was fairly active in the church, one of his parents wasn't.  Everyone seemed fine with that, and he didn't think that parent was any less of a person because of their religious views.  He served a full time mission, and we got married in the temple.  I was grateful we shared religious views, and I was so excited to be married for eternity, because I wanted (and still do, incidentally) to spend forever with him.  None of this "til death do you part" crap.

    I think my testimony for the last ten years or so was basically "There are people in the church who are smarter than me, and study much, much harder.  If this makes sense and seems true to them, then I must be missing something.  I will go along with them".  I consider myself to be a bright person, but I know there are people out there a lot smarter than me.  There's people I know and respect who are extremely active members, and believe every word of it.  They are intelligent, wise people.  So why do they still believe? I know people who even know many of the things that finally drove me to become inactive.  They have somehow made peace with the knowledge of how the Book of Abraham came to be.  They are ok with the polygamist teachings.  They accept the Book of Mormon as truth even though they know of the evidence otherwise.  I honestly don't know how they come to grips with it.  The most definitive answer I've gotten is that it just still feels right, and even though the church is flawed, it teaches more truths than any other. 

Thursday, 25 September 2008

  • And the bishop strikes back

    I got a phone call from the relief society president today.  The bishop called her, and asked if I was still visiting teaching.  She explained that she'd asked if I still felt comfortable doing it, and since I was, kept me on the list.  He said he was questioning the wisdom of that, and asked that she release me as a visiting teacher. 

    She seemed nervous telling me this, like I'd be really upset.  She even asked if I was ok with it.

    I said, "Well, honestly, I'm a little insulted. But I have to admit that I understand the reasoning behind his decision".

    It's true.  If I were in the bishop's shoes, I don't think I'd want an admitted apostate going into people's homes as a representative of my church.  Sure, I wouldn't tell these ladies my beliefs.  But, people did see me in tank tops this summer, and I haven't stepped foot in church for months.  It's bound to raise questions, and I have always been upfront and honest with people.

    I am relieved to not have to worry about it anymore.  I felt uncomfortable going in there, and trying to deliver a message that I didn't necessarily believe.  I was even annoyed with myself for saying I still wanted to do it.

    But, on the other hand, I don't like the implication that I was going to try and lure other people away.

    I am going to choose not to take offense because I would do the same thing if roles were reversed, and frankly, I don't want to feel obligated to go visit people anymore.  I may try to strike up friendships with the two girls we visited though, and it would feel more genuine since I wouldn't have a church assignment behind me.

  • Threats Against the Bishop

    I am still a cub scout leader.  I know!!! I'm nearly as surprised as you are!

    Things have been going along as though it is perfectly normal to have three den leaders.  All right.  Whatever.


    A couple days ago, I was talking to one of my boys' mom.  I had confided in her that I suspected they were about to release me, hence the third leader.  I told her of my paranoias and suspicions, and she jumped to the same conclusion as me.  She was really quite upset, as she was looking forward to her son being in my group.

    She also told me that this same bishop that I have never had a problem with has given her some problems.  She has a few tattoos.  She was starting to get active in the church again.  They were thinking of getting their endowments taken out, so they were trying to be good little Mormons and attend every week.  The bishop approached her one week, and asked that she wear clothing that covered all of her tattoos.  Due to the placement of her tattoos, that would put her in long sleeved shirts and ankle length skirts, or opaque tights.  She was pretty offended, and from what she says, their church attendance has dropped off considerably since then.

    Anyway, a day or so after she found out about the third leader, apparently she cornered our bishop and threatened him with severe bodily harm (jokingly?) if he released me.  From the way she told it, she gave quite the impassioned speech.  I have to admit if I had known she was going to do that, I would've been more circumspect with my suspicions.  Oh well, too late now.

    So, maybe I'm only a leader now because of her threats and speech?  Who knows.

Satya987

  • Visit Satya987's Xanga Site
    • Member Since: 1/12/2008

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

[no info]

Blogrings

[no blogrings]

Pulse

Satya987 has no pulse!...

Chatboard (1)

  • UlChangeWhenUMeetHim
    Well here we go. I am so pleased with the huge turnout last weekend a block from where I live in downtown SLC! What a confirmation of current and past prophets of those who will oppose the True Church of God as God does not bend or bow to silly man-made rules. I've got a lot to say and a fair sh